On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:56:29PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:26:05AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Paul, could you review this patch please? > > > > Documentation/memory-barriers.txt says that unlock has a weaker > > > > uni-directional barrier, but in practice srcu_read_unlock calls > > > > smp_mb(). > > > > > > > > Is it OK to rely on this? If not, can I add > > > > smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock (making it an empty macro for now) > > > > so we can avoid an actual extra smp_mb()? > > > > > > Please use smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock(). After all, it was not > > > that long ago that srcu_read_unlock() contained no memory barriers, > > > and perhaps some day it won't need to once again. > > > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > > > > Thanks! > > Something like this will be enough? > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h > > index c114614..9b058ee 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/srcu.h > > +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h > > @@ -237,4 +237,18 @@ static inline void srcu_read_unlock(struct srcu_struct > > *sp, int idx) > > __srcu_read_unlock(sp, idx); > > } > > > > +/** > > + * smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock - ensure full ordering after > > srcu_read_unlock > > + * > > + * Converts the preceding srcu_read_unlock into a two-way memory barrier. > > + * > > + * Call this after srcu_read_unlock, to guarantee that all memory > > operations > > + * that occur after smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock will appear to happen > > after > > + * the preceding srcu_read_unlock. > > + */ > > +static inline void smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock(void) > > +{ > > + /* __srcu_read_unlock has smp_mb() internally so nothing to do here. */ > > +} > > + > > #endif > > Yep, that should do it! > This looks dubious to me. All other smp_mb__after_* variants are there because some atomic operations have different memory barrier semantics on different arches, but srcu_read_unlock() have the same semantics on all arches, so smp_mb__after_srcu_read_unlock() becomes smp_mb__after_a_function_that_happens_to_have_mb_now_but_may_not_have_in_the_feature(). How likely it is that smp_mb() will disappear from srcu_read_unlock() (if was added for a reason I guess)? May be we should change documentation to say that srcu_read_unlock() is a memory barrier which will reflect the reality.
-- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html