Il 12/11/2013 11:03, Marc Zyngier ha scritto: >> > >> > I'd cast my vote (if I have one) towards the sharing a tree method. For >> > those of us scrambling to get caught up with kvmarm, a reduction in the >> > number of trees and branches we need to track would be a welcome change. > Not sure what the benefit would be. We'd go from two trees with > respectively x and y branches, to a single tree with x+y branches. > > Christoffer and I tend to work on separate topics, we track what the > other does, and we make sure we don't overlap. And if we do, we shove > the related patches in the same branch. Overall, whether or not we > switch to co-maintainership, I don't expect our workflow to change much.
Yes, I think your workflow is fine as is. Andrew, with two co-maintainers Christoffer and Marc would probably send more frequent pull requests. You're probably better off sending them patches based on kvm/next directly. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
