On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:16:27AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:01:27AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:02:07AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:18:55AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:58:15PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > > I see this in kvm:
> > > > >
> > > > > static u64 vmx_get_mt_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, bool
> > > > > is_mmio)
> > > > > {
> > > > > u64 ret;
> > > > >
> > > > > /* For VT-d and EPT combination
> > > > > * 1. MMIO: always map as UC
> > > > > * 2. EPT with VT-d:
> > > > > * a. VT-d without snooping control feature: can't guarantee
> > > > > * the
> > > > > * result, try to trust guest.
> > > > > * b. VT-d with snooping control feature: snooping control
> > > > > * feature of
> > > > > * VT-d engine can guarantee the cache correctness. Just
> > > > > * set it
> > > > > * to WB to keep consistent with host. So the same as
> > > > > item
> > > > > * 3.
> > > > > * 3. EPT without VT-d: always map as WB and set IPAT=1 to
> > > > > keep
> > > > > * consistent with host MTRR
> > > > > */
> > > > > if (is_mmio)
> > > > > ret = MTRR_TYPE_UNCACHABLE << VMX_EPT_MT_EPTE_SHIFT;
> > > > >
> > > > > ...
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > does this mean that even if guest maps BAR for an assigned device
> > > > > as write combined (or configures such using an MTRR),
> > > > > host will override this and use uncacheable in practice?
> > > > >
> > > > No, it does not mean that. I already answered this once (my previous
> > > > answer included below): effective memory type is a combination of MTRR
> > > > (EPT MT bits in case of a guest) and PAT bits. See section 11.5.2.2
> > > > in SDM
> > >
> > >
> > > Can you quote chapter name please?
> > > My SDM has
> > > 11.5.2.2 Denormal-Operand Exception (#D)
> > >
> > Either your or mine is out of date:
> > Selecting Memory Types for Pentium III and More Recent Processor Families
>
> OK this one I'm familiar with, it describes how PAT
> interacts with MTRR. But how does this interact with EPT?
> do you remember where's that described?
>
28.2.5.2 Memory Type Used for Translated Guest-Physical Addresses
Substitute MTRR with EPT MT and go to the same table.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
