On 04/05/2015 04:48, Tiejun Chen wrote:
> We already check KVM_CAP_IRQFD in generic once enable CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD,
>
> kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic()
> |
> + switch (arg) {
> + ...
> + #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> + #endif
> + ...
> + return 1;
> + ...
> + }
> |
> + kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension()
>
> So its not necessary to check this in arch again, and also fix one typo,
> s/emlation/emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tiejun Chen <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index d9631ec..483b5d1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -171,7 +171,6 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long
> ext)
> int r;
> switch (ext) {
> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP:
> - case KVM_CAP_IRQFD:
> case KVM_CAP_IOEVENTFD:
> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL:
> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY:
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 4b60056..2fa7302 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_hvm_config {
> *
> * KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE indicates resamplefd is valid and specifies
> * the irqfd to operate in resampling mode for level triggered interrupt
> - * emlation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> + * emulation. See Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt.
> */
> #define KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE (1 << 1)
>
>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Christoffer/Marc, please apply to the ARM tree in order to avoid
pointless conflicts in kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension.
Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
