On 22/07/15 08:19, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> I don't care much for such an API, mostly because it will obviously
>> bitrot very quickly (your "broken VGIC" platform is hopefully a one off
>> that won't be repeated again, and the RPi is out of scope anyway).
>>
>> It would have to be extremely non-intrusive and completely safe for this
>> to be taken in...
>
> Ok, let's leave this API alone then for now...
> Will then be a concensus if i tweak the thing a little bit and we just
> enable KVM without both vGIC
> and vTimer ? It will be an emulator's problem how to handle them then.
Well, let's see the patches first, and how invasive they are.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
