On 08/10/15 11:14, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:44:27PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
>> Current KVM code has lots of old redundancies, which can be cleaned up.
>> This patchset is actually a better alternative to
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg430726.html, which allows to
>> keep piggy-backed LRs. The idea is based on the fact that our code also
>> maintains LR state in elrsr, and this information is enough to track LR
>> usage.
>>
>> This patchset is made against linux-next of 02.10.2015. Thanks to Andre
>> for pointing out some 4.3 specifics.
>>
> I'm not opposed to these changes, they clean up the data structures
> which is definitely a good thing.
>
> I am a bit worries about how/if this is going to conflict with the ITS
> series and other patches in flight touchignt he vgic.
>
> Marc/Andre, any thoughts on this?
I don't mind the simplification (Andre was already removing the
piggybacking stuff as part of his ITS series). I'm a bit more cautious
about the sync_elrsr stuff, but that's mostly because I've only read the
patch in a superficial way.
But yes, this is probably going to clash, unless we make this part of an
existing series (/me looks at André... ;-)
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
