On 22 December 2015 at 14:39, Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:08:10AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Won't this result in our incorrectly skipping the first insn >> in the fault handler if the original offending instruction >> was itself the first insn in the fault handler? >> > Wouldn't that then loop with the exception forever?
Yes, but so would real hardware... thanks -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
