On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 02:25:02PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 31/03/2016 11:09, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >> My comments to Vladimir's bug report notwithstanding, there's still a > >> choice here to: > >> > >> 1) Expand/modify the KVM IO bus framework to take an arbitrary number of > >> devices > >> > >> 2) Build a KVM architectureal generic framework on top of the IO bus > >> framework to handle individual register regions. > >> > >> 3) Stick with what we had before, do not modify the KVM IO bus stuff, > >> and handle the individual register region business locally within the > >> arm/vgic code. > > I prefer 3, or alternatively just add the framework in virt/kvm/arm so > that it can be migrated to virt/kvm if someone else needs it. > Sounds like a plan. Thanks Paolo.
-Christoffer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
