Hi Andre,
On 03/26/2016 03:14 AM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> LPIs are dynamically created (mapped) at guest runtime and their
> actual numbers can be quite high, but is mostly assigned using a very
> sparse allocation scheme. So arrays are not an ideal data structure
> to hold the information. We use our equivalent of the "Interrupt
> Translation Table Entry" (ITTE) to hold the vgic_irq struct for a
> virtual LPI embedded in in the ITTE.
> Connect the VGIC core code via an accessor function to help it get the
> struct vgic_irq for a certain LPI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
Looks OK to me
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <[email protected]>

Eric
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/its-emul.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h     |  8 +++++++-
>  2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/its-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/its-emul.c
> index c0334ff..1188e9a 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/its-emul.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/its-emul.c
> @@ -55,11 +55,29 @@ struct its_collection {
>  struct its_itte {
>       struct list_head itte_list;
>  
> +     struct vgic_irq irq;
>       struct its_collection *collection;
>       u32 lpi;
>       u32 event_id;
>  };
>  
> +/* To be used as an iterator this macro misses the enclosing parentheses */
> +#define for_each_lpi(dev, itte, kvm) \
> +     list_for_each_entry(dev, &(kvm)->arch.vgic.its.device_list, dev_list) \
> +             list_for_each_entry(itte, &(dev)->itt, itte_list)
> +
> +static struct its_itte *find_itte_by_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, int lpi)
> +{
> +     struct its_device *device;
> +     struct its_itte *itte;
> +
> +     for_each_lpi(device, itte, kvm) {
> +             if (itte->lpi == lpi)
> +                     return itte;
> +     }
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  #define BASER_BASE_ADDRESS(x) ((x) & 0xfffffffff000ULL)
>  
>  static int vgic_mmio_read_its_ctlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> @@ -166,6 +184,17 @@ static int vgic_mmio_read_its_idregs(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu,
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid)
> +{
> +     struct its_itte *itte;
> +
> +     itte = find_itte_by_lpi(kvm, intid);
> +     if (!itte)
> +             return NULL;
> +
> +     return &itte->irq;
> +}
> +
>  static void its_free_itte(struct its_itte *itte)
>  {
>       list_del(&itte->itte_list);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 08f97d1..160c511 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ int vgic_register_redist_regions(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t 
> dist_base_address);
>  
>  int vits_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>  void vgic_enable_lpis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid);
>  void vits_destroy(struct kvm *kvm);
>  #else
>  static inline void vgic_v3_irq_change_affinity(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid,
> @@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ static inline int vgic_register_redist_regions(struct kvm 
> *kvm,
>       return -ENODEV;
>  }
>  
> -int vits_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> +static inline int vits_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -139,6 +140,11 @@ static inline void vgic_enable_lpis(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu)
>       return;
>  }
>  
> +static inline struct vgic_irq *vgic_its_get_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid)
> +{
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void vits_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>       return;
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to