On 17 September 2016 at 16:38, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 17 September 2016 at 16:28, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> 
> wrote:
>> Another thing to keep in mind is that GICv2
>> compatibility is disabled on the non-secure side if the secure side
>> elects to configure its view of the GIC as v3 (i.e., in order to
>> support >8 cores)
>
> If I'm reading the 'legacy configurations' chapter of the GICv3
> spec correctly, that is true for the NS host OS (ie the one
> handling physical interrupts) but a guest OS can still use
> the old GICv2-compat interface (assuming it was implemented
> in silicon at all).
>

Ah right, apologies for spreading misinformation. But my first point
is still valid.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to