On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 06:42:50PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> Hi Drew,
> 
> On 15/07/2016 15:00, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2: add more details in the output if a test fails,
> >     report spurious interrupts if we get them
> > ---
> >  arm/Makefile.common |   6 +-
> >  arm/gic.c           | 194 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arm/unittests.cfg   |   7 ++
> >  3 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arm/gic.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/arm/Makefile.common b/arm/Makefile.common
> > index 41239c37e0920..bc38183ab86e0 100644
> > --- a/arm/Makefile.common
> > +++ b/arm/Makefile.common
> > @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ ifeq ($(LOADADDR),)
> >     LOADADDR = 0x40000000
> >  endif
> >  
> > -tests-common = \
> > -   $(TEST_DIR)/selftest.flat \
> > -   $(TEST_DIR)/spinlock-test.flat
> > +tests-common  = $(TEST_DIR)/selftest.flat
> > +tests-common += $(TEST_DIR)/spinlock-test.flat
> > +tests-common += $(TEST_DIR)/gic.flat
> >  
> >  all: test_cases
> >  
> > diff --git a/arm/gic.c b/arm/gic.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..cf7ec1c90413c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arm/gic.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
> > +/*
> > + * GIC tests
> > + *
> > + * GICv2
> > + *   . test sending/receiving IPIs
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016, Red Hat Inc, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <asm/setup.h>
> > +#include <asm/processor.h>
> > +#include <asm/gic.h>
> > +#include <asm/smp.h>
> > +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> > +
> > +static int gic_version;
> > +static int acked[NR_CPUS], spurious[NR_CPUS];
> > +static cpumask_t ready;
> > +
> > +static void nr_cpu_check(int nr)
> > +{
> > +   if (nr_cpus < nr)
> > +           report_abort("At least %d cpus required", nr);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void wait_on_ready(void)
> > +{
> > +   cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &ready);
> > +   while (!cpumask_full(&ready))
> > +           cpu_relax();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void check_acked(cpumask_t *mask)
> > +{
> > +   int missing = 0, extra = 0, unexpected = 0;
> > +   int nr_pass, cpu, i;
> > +
> > +   /* Wait up to 5s for all interrupts to be delivered */
> > +   for (i = 0; i < 50; ++i) {
> > +           mdelay(100);
> > +           nr_pass = 0;
> > +           for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> Couldn't we use for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)?

If we did, then we wouldn't be able to detect delivery of interrupts to
the wrong cpus. Note, we don't run the second loop if everything looks
good here. That one is just to better report a detected problem(s).

> > +                   smp_rmb();
> > +                   nr_pass += cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask) ?
> > +                           acked[cpu] == 1 : acked[cpu] == 0;
> > +           }
> > +           if (nr_pass == nr_cpus) {
> > +                   report("Completed in %d ms", true, ++i * 100);
> > +                   return;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > +           if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, mask)) {
> here we can't since we count unexpected
> 
> > +                   if (!acked[cpu])
> > +                           ++missing;
> > +                   else if (acked[cpu] > 1)
> > +                           ++extra;
> > +           } else {
> > +                   if (acked[cpu])
> > +                           ++unexpected;
> > +           }
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   report("Timed-out (5s). ACKS: missing=%d extra=%d unexpected=%d",
> > +          false, missing, extra, unexpected);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused)
> > +{
> > +   u32 iar = readl(gicv2_cpu_base() + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
> > +
> > +   if (iar != GICC_INT_SPURIOUS) {
> > +           writel(iar, gicv2_cpu_base() + GIC_CPU_EOI);
> if EOIMode is set may need to DIR as well.

OK, I'll look into that

> > +           smp_rmb(); /* pairs with wmb in ipi_test functions */
> > +           ++acked[smp_processor_id()];
> > +           smp_wmb(); /* pairs with rmb in check_acked */
> > +   } else {
> > +           ++spurious[smp_processor_id()];
> > +           smp_wmb();
> > +   }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_test_self(void)
> > +{
> > +   cpumask_t mask;
> > +
> > +   report_prefix_push("self");
> > +   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> > +   smp_wmb();
> > +   cpumask_clear(&mask);
> > +   cpumask_set_cpu(0, &mask);
> > +   writel(2 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
> > +   check_acked(&mask);
> > +   report_prefix_pop();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_test_smp(void)
> > +{
> > +   cpumask_t mask;
> > +   unsigned long tlist;
> > +
> > +   report_prefix_push("target-list");
> > +   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> > +   smp_wmb();
> > +   tlist = cpumask_bits(&cpu_present_mask)[0] & 0xaa;
> > +   cpumask_bits(&mask)[0] = tlist;
> > +   writel((u8)tlist << 16, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
> > +   check_acked(&mask);
> > +   report_prefix_pop();
> > +
> > +   report_prefix_push("broadcast");
> > +   memset(acked, 0, sizeof(acked));
> > +   smp_wmb();
> > +   cpumask_copy(&mask, &cpu_present_mask);
> > +   cpumask_clear_cpu(0, &mask);
> > +   writel(1 << 24, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
> > +   check_acked(&mask);
> > +   report_prefix_pop();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_enable(void)
> > +{
> > +   gicv2_enable_defaults();
> > +#ifdef __arm__
> > +   install_exception_handler(EXCPTN_IRQ, ipi_handler);
> > +#else
> > +   install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, ipi_handler);
> > +#endif
> > +   local_irq_enable();
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ipi_recv(void)
> > +{
> > +   ipi_enable();
> > +   cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &ready);
> > +   while (1)
> > +           wfi();
> > +}
> > +
> > +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > +{
> > +   char pfx[8];
> > +   int cpu;
> > +
> > +   gic_version = gic_init();
> > +   if (!gic_version)
> > +           report_abort("No gic present!");
> > +
> > +   snprintf(pfx, 8, "gicv%d", gic_version);
> > +   report_prefix_push(pfx);
> > +
> > +   if (argc < 2) {
> > +
> spare void line
> > +           report_prefix_push("ipi");
> > +           ipi_enable();
> > +           ipi_test_self();
> > +           report_prefix_pop();
> > +
> same
> > +   } else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "ipi")) {
> > +
> same or maybe this is just another style convention?

Indeed it is. I don't think the kernel's checkpatch
complains about it and I find it much easier to read.

> > +           report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> > +           nr_cpu_check(2);
> > +           ipi_enable();
> > +
> > +           for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > +                   if (cpu == 0)
> > +                           continue;
> > +                   smp_boot_secondary(cpu, ipi_recv);
> > +           }
> > +           wait_on_ready();
> > +           ipi_test_self();
> > +           ipi_test_smp();
> > +
> > +           smp_rmb();
> > +           for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > +                   if (spurious[cpu]) {
> > +                           printf("ipi: WARN: cpu%d got %d spurious "
> > +                                  "interrupts\n",
> > +                                  spurious[cpu], smp_processor_id());
> > +                   }
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           report_prefix_pop();
> > +
> > +   } else {
> > +           report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return report_summary();
> > +}
> > diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> > index ffd12e5794aa0..bb364675043f0 100644
> > --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> > +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> > @@ -51,3 +51,10 @@ file = selftest.flat
> >  smp = $MAX_SMP
> >  extra_params = -append 'smp'
> >  groups = selftest
> > +
> > +# Test GIC emulation
> > +[gicv2-ipi]
> > +file = gic.flat
> > +smp = $((($MAX_SMP < 8)?$MAX_SMP:8))
> > +extra_params = -machine gic-version=2 -append 'ipi'
> > +groups = gic
> > 
> Aside the minor comments above,
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>

Thanks!
drew
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to