Hello,

On 3/27/2017 10:19 PM, gengdongjiu wrote:
Hi Tyler,

I have a question for below code.

On 2017/3/25 0:01, Christoffer Dall wrote:
        is_iabt = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu);
-       if (unlikely(!is_iabt && kvm_vcpu_dabt_isextabt(vcpu))) {
+       if (unlikely(!is_iabt && kvm_vcpu_dabt_isextabt(vcpu)) && sea_status) {
                kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu);
when it is SEA synchronized abort, why here inject a asynchronous abort through 
kvm_inject_vabt(vcpu) instead of synchronized abort? seem the original kvm 
source code is also do that, so I am confused about that.
thanks .
If the SEA was properly handled, then sea_status will avoid injecting the vabt. I'm going to just return after the SEA handling in the next patch though.

Thanks,
Tyler

                return 1;
        }

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm 
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to