On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 05:34:13PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> On 16/10/17 14:41, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 07:26:10PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> >> + u64 elr = read_sysreg(elr_el1);
> >> + u32 kernel_mode = read_sysreg(CurrentEL) | 1; /* +SPSel */
> >> + unsigned long vbar = read_sysreg(vbar_el1);
> >> +
> >> + /* Retrieve the missing registers values */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < clobbered_registers; i++) {
> >> + /* from within the handler, this call always succeeds */
> >> + sdei_api_event_context(i, ®s->regs[i]);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * We didn't take an exception to get here, set PAN. UAO will be cleared
> >> + * by sdei_event_handler()s set_fs(USER_DS) call.
> >> + */
> >> + asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,
> >> + CONFIG_ARM64_PAN));
>
> > Can you use uaccess_disable() directly?
>
> Wouldn't this invoke sw-pan's __uaccess_ttbr0_disable():
> > write_sysreg(ttbr, ttbr0_el1);
>
> Probing depends on VHE if booted at EL2, can we guarantee to have PAN (and
> therefore not-SW-PAN) too?
>
> (otherwise I can add 'depends on !ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN' to the Kconfig)
We want the Kconfig to be able to include all features. What you can do
though is:
select ARM64_PAN if ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN
With VHE (ARMv8.2) we can guarantee that hardware PAN is around.
--
Catalin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
