On Wed, Oct 18 2017 at 1:34:05 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 05:21:24PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 23/09/17 01:41, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> > Currently get_cycles() is hardwired to arch_counter_get_cntvct() on
>> > arm64, but as we move to using the physical timer for the in-kernel
>> > time-keeping, we need to make that more flexible.
>> >
>> > First, we need to make sure the physical counter can be read on equal
>> > terms to the virtual counter, which includes adding physical counter
>> > read functions for timers that require errata.
>> >
>> > Second, we need to make a choice between reading the physical vs virtual
>> > counter, depending on which timer is used for time keeping in the kernel
>> > otherwise. We can do this using a static key to avoid a performance
>> > penalty during runtime when reading the counter.
>> >
>> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]>
>> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>
[...]
>> In my reply to patch #2, I had the following hunk:
>>
>> @@ -310,7 +329,7 @@ static void erratum_set_next_event_tval_generic(const
>> int access, unsigned long
>> struct clock_event_device *clk)
>> {
>> unsigned long ctrl;
>> - u64 cval = evt + arch_counter_get_cntvct();
>> + u64 cval = evt + arch_timer_read_counter();
>>
>> ctrl = arch_timer_reg_read(access, ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL, clk);
>> ctrl |= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE;
>>
>> Once we start using a different timer, this could well have an effect...
>>
>
> Right, but wouldn't the following be a more correct way to go about it then:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 9a7b359..07f19db 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -329,16 +329,19 @@ static void erratum_set_next_event_tval_generic(const
> int access, unsigned long
> struct clock_event_device *clk)
> {
> unsigned long ctrl;
> - u64 cval = evt + arch_timer_read_counter();
> + u64 cval;
>
> ctrl = arch_timer_reg_read(access, ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL, clk);
> ctrl |= ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_ENABLE;
> ctrl &= ~ARCH_TIMER_CTRL_IT_MASK;
>
> - if (access == ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS)
> + if (access == ARCH_TIMER_PHYS_ACCESS) {
> + cval = evt + arch_counter_get_cntpct();
> write_sysreg(cval, cntp_cval_el0);
> - else
> + } else {
> + cval = evt + arch_counter_get_cntvct();
> write_sysreg(cval, cntv_cval_el0);
> + }
>
> arch_timer_reg_write(access, ARCH_TIMER_REG_CTRL, ctrl, clk);
> }
Yup, that's much better.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
