On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:41:24PM +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> There is no need to have multiple identical functions with different
> names for saving host and guest state.  When saving and restoring state
> for the host and guest, the state is the same for both contexts, and
> that's why we have the kvm_cpu_context structure.  Delete one
> version and rename the other into simply save/restore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h |  6 ++----
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c      | 10 +++++-----
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c   | 18 ++----------------
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h 
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> index 998152d..3f54c55 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> @@ -132,10 +132,8 @@ int __vgic_v3_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu);
>  void __timer_enable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void __timer_disable_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
> -void __sysreg_save_host_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> -void __sysreg_restore_host_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> -void __sysreg_save_guest_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> -void __sysreg_restore_guest_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> +void __sysreg_save_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> +void __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
>  void sysreg_save_host_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
>  void sysreg_restore_host_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
>  void sysreg_save_guest_state_vhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 7c4d430..6356bec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       host_ctxt->__hyp_running_vcpu = vcpu;
>       guest_ctxt = &vcpu->arch.ctxt;
>  
> -     __sysreg_save_host_state_nvhe(host_ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_save_state_nvhe(host_ctxt);
>  
>       __activate_traps(vcpu);
>       __activate_vm(vcpu);
> @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>        * to erratum #852523 (Cortex-A57) or #853709 (Cortex-A72).
>        */
>       __sysreg32_restore_state(vcpu);
> -     __sysreg_restore_guest_state_nvhe(guest_ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe(guest_ctxt);
>       __debug_switch_to_guest(vcpu);
>  
>       /* Jump in the fire! */
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       if (fixup_guest_exit(vcpu, &exit_code))
>               goto again;
>  
> -     __sysreg_save_guest_state_nvhe(guest_ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_save_state_nvhe(guest_ctxt);
>       __sysreg32_save_state(vcpu);
>       __timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
>       __vgic_save_state(vcpu);
> @@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>       __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
>       __deactivate_vm(vcpu);
>  
> -     __sysreg_restore_host_state_nvhe(host_ctxt);
> +     __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe(host_ctxt);
>  
>       /*
>        * This must come after restoring the host sysregs, since a non-VHE
> @@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __hyp_call_panic_nvhe(u64 spsr, 
> u64 elr, u64 par,
>               __timer_disable_traps(vcpu);
>               __deactivate_traps(vcpu);
>               __deactivate_vm(vcpu);
> -             __sysreg_restore_host_state_nvhe(__host_ctxt);
> +             __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe(__host_ctxt);
>       }
>  
>       /*
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> index d8c42de..f5c1b44 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
> @@ -70,14 +70,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_el1_state(struct 
> kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>       ctxt->gp_regs.regs.pstate       = read_sysreg_el2(spsr);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_host_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> -{
> -     __sysreg_save_el1_state(ctxt);
> -     __sysreg_save_common_state(ctxt);
> -     __sysreg_save_user_state(ctxt);
> -}
> -
> -void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_guest_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
> +void __hyp_text __sysreg_save_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>       __sysreg_save_el1_state(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_save_common_state(ctxt);
> @@ -138,14 +131,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct 
> kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>       write_sysreg_el2(ctxt->gp_regs.regs.pstate,     spsr);
>  }
>  
> -void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_host_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
> -{
> -     __sysreg_restore_el1_state(ctxt);
> -     __sysreg_restore_common_state(ctxt);
> -     __sysreg_restore_user_state(ctxt);
> -}
> -
> -void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_guest_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context 
> *ctxt)
> +void __hyp_text __sysreg_restore_state_nvhe(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
>  {
>       __sysreg_restore_el1_state(ctxt);
>       __sysreg_restore_common_state(ctxt);
> -- 
> 2.9.0
>

I think this patch could be squashed into the last one without
complicating the review. Anyway

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to