On 10 January 2018 at 11:25, Jean-Philippe Brucker
<jean-philippe.bruc...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 10/01/18 11:19, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Are there uses that make it worthwhile to get virtio-1
>> support added to virtio-mmio, rather than just getting
>> people to move over to virtio-pci instead ?
>
> virtio-iommu uses virtio-mmio transport. It makes little sense to have an
> IOMMU presented as a PCI endpoint.

Having an entire transport just for the IOMMU doesn't make
a great deal of sense either though :-) If we didn't already
have virtio-mmio kicking around would we really have designed
it that way?

thanks
-- PMM
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to