Hi Christoffer,

On 02/08/2018 01:24 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 06:04:25PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/01/18 12:07, Christoffer Dall wrote:
+
        panic(__hyp_panic_string,
              spsr,  elr,
              read_sysreg_el2(esr),   read_sysreg_el2(far),
              read_sysreg(hpfar_el2), par, vcpu);
  }
-static hyp_alternate_select(__hyp_call_panic,
-                           __hyp_call_panic_nvhe, __hyp_call_panic_vhe,
-                           ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN);


Out of interest, any specific rather to remove hyp_alternate_select and
"open-code" it?


Not sure I understand your question.

Are you asking why I replace the hyp alternatives with the has_vhe()?
If so, has_vhe() uses a static key and should therefore have the same
performance characteristics, but I find the has_vhe() version below much
more readable.

That what I was asking. Thank you for the explanation.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to