On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:30:54PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
>
> On 15/02/18 21:03, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >@@ -85,37 +123,14 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu
> >*vcpu)
> > {
> > u64 hcr = vcpu->arch.hcr_el2;
> >- /*
> >- * We are about to set CPTR_EL2.TFP to trap all floating point
> >- * register accesses to EL2, however, the ARM ARM clearly states that
> >- * traps are only taken to EL2 if the operation would not otherwise
> >- * trap to EL1. Therefore, always make sure that for 32-bit guests,
> >- * we set FPEXC.EN to prevent traps to EL1, when setting the TFP bit.
> >- * If FP/ASIMD is not implemented, FPEXC is UNDEFINED and any access to
> >- * it will cause an exception.
> >- */
> >- if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu) && system_supports_fpsimd()) {
> >- write_sysreg(1 << 30, fpexc32_el2);
> >- isb();
> >- }
> >+ write_sysreg(hcr, hcr_el2);
> > if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN) && (hcr & HCR_VSE))
> > write_sysreg_s(vcpu->arch.vsesr_el2, SYS_VSESR_EL2);
> >- write_sysreg(hcr, hcr_el2);
>
> OOI, any reason to move the write to HCR_EL2 just before the if?
>
Just to keep the two lines together where we read the value from the
vcpu structure and write it to hardware. It's hard to tell from this
patch, but I think it looks nicer in the end.
Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
