On 04/10/2018 07:07 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com> > wrote: >> On 04/06/2018 03:14 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Andrey Ryabinin <aryabi...@virtuozzo.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Nevertheless, this doesn't mean that we should ignore *all* accesses to >>>> !slab memory. >>> >>> So you mean we need to find a way to ignore accesses via pointers >>> returned by page_address(), but still check accesses through all other >>> pointers tagged with 0xFF? I don't see an obvious way to do this. I'm >>> open to suggestions though. >>> >> >> I'm saying that we need to ignore accesses to slab objects if pointer >> to slab object obtained via page_address() + offset_in_page() trick, but >> don't ignore >> anything else. >> >> So, save tag somewhere in page struct and poison shadow with that tag. Make >> page_address() to >> return tagged address for all !PageSlab() pages. For PageSlab() pages >> page_address() should return >> 0xff tagged address, so we could ignore such accesses. > > Which pages do you mean by !PageSlab()?
Literally the "PageSlab(page) == false" pages. > The ones that are allocated and freed by pagealloc, but mot managed by the > slab allocator? Yes. > Perhaps we should then add tagging to the pagealloc hook instead? > Of course the tagging would be in kasan_alloc_pages(), where else that could be? And instead of what? _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
