On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:39:22PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> To enable arm64-specific vcpu ioctls to be added cleanly, this
> patch adds a kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() hook so that these don't
> pollute the common code.
>
> No functional change: the -EINVAL return for unknown ioctls is
> retained, though it may or may not be intentional (KVM returns
> -ENXIO in various other similar contexts).
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c36760b..df2659d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #ifndef __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__
> #define __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__
>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_types.h>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> @@ -278,6 +279,12 @@ static inline int
> kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_perf_init(void);
> int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 8e9cd43..bbde597 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(userspace_irqchip_in_use);
> int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void);
> int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext);
> +int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
> void __extended_idmap_trampoline(phys_addr_t boot_pgd, phys_addr_t
> idmap_start);
>
> struct kvm_arch {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 89eab68..331b85e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -546,6 +546,12 @@ int kvm_vcpu_preferred_target(struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 1418af9..6e894a8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return kvm_arm_vcpu_set_events(vcpu, &events);
> }
> default:
> - r = -EINVAL;
> + r = kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, ioctl, arg);
I don't like this additional indirection. Is it just to avoid defining
the SVE ioctl value on 32-bit ARM?
I think you should just handle the ioctl here and return an error on the
32-bit side, like we do for other things.
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Christoffer
> }
>
> return r;
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
