On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:39:24PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> To enable arm64-specific vm ioctls to be added cleanly, this patch
> adds a kvm_arm_arch_vm_ioctl() hook so that these don't pollute the
> common code.
Hmmm, I don't really see the strenght of that argument, and have the
same concern as before. I'd like to avoid the additional indirection
and instead just follow the existing pattern with a dummy implementation
on the 32-bit side that returns an error.
Thanks,
Christoffer
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 6 ++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index df2659d..0850fcd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ static inline int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct vcpu
> *vcpu,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static inline int kvm_arm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_perf_init(void);
> int kvm_perf_teardown(void);
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 5225485..ae25f14 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext);
> int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
> +int kvm_arm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg);
> void __extended_idmap_trampoline(phys_addr_t boot_pgd, phys_addr_t
> idmap_start);
>
> struct kvm_arch {
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index d96145a..f066b17 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,12 @@ int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> +int kvm_arm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct kvm *kvm,
> + unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_get_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
> {
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 6e894a8..6582a38 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -1279,7 +1279,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> return 0;
> }
> default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + return kvm_arm_arch_vm_ioctl(kvm, ioctl, arg);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.1.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
