On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:13:16PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 08/11/2018 20:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 06:05:55PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> On 06/11/18 08:15, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:36:16PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >>>> Early versions of Cortex-A76 can end-up with corrupt TLBs if they
> >>>> speculate an AT instruction in during a guest switch while the
> >>>> S1/S2 system registers are in an inconsistent state.
> >>>>
> >>>> Work around it by:
> >>>> - Mandating VHE
> >>>> - Make sure that S1 and S2 system registers are consistent before
> >>>> clearing HCR_EL2.TGE, which allows AT to target the EL1 translation
> >>>> regime
> >>>>
> >>>> These two things together ensure that we cannot hit this erratum.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> >>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 ++-
> >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
> >>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 6 ++++++
> >>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 8 ++++++++
> >>>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >>>> 7 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> >>>> b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> >>>> index 76ccded8b74c..04f0bc4690c6 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
> >>>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ stable kernels.
> >>>> | ARM | Cortex-A73 | #858921 |
> >>>> ARM64_ERRATUM_858921 |
> >>>> | ARM | Cortex-A55 | #1024718 |
> >>>> ARM64_ERRATUM_1024718 |
> >>>> | ARM | Cortex-A76 | #1188873 |
> >>>> ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873 |
> >>>> +| ARM | Cortex-A76 | #1165522 |
> >>>> ARM64_ERRATUM_1165522 |
> >>>> | ARM | MMU-500 | #841119,#826419 | N/A
> >>>> |
> >>>> | | | |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | Cavium | ThunderX ITS | #22375, #24313 |
> >>>> CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375 |
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> >>>> index 787d7850e064..a68bc6cc2167 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> >>>> @@ -497,6 +497,18 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1188873
> >>>>
> >>>> If unsure, say Y.
> >>>>
> >>>> +config ARM64_ERRATUM_1165522
> >>>> + bool "Cortex-A76: Speculative AT instruction using
> >>>> out-of-context translation regime could cause subsequent request to
> >>>> generate an incorrect translation"
> >>>> + default y
> >>>> + help
> >>>> + This option adds work arounds for ARM Cortex-A76 erratum
> >>>> 1165522
> >>>> +
> >>>> + Affected Cortex-A76 cores (r0p0, r1p0, r2p0) could end-up with
> >>>> + corrupted TLBs by speculating an AT instruction during a guest
> >>>> + context switch.
> >>>> +
> >>>> + If unsure, say Y.
> >>>> +
> >>>> config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375
> >>>> bool "Cavium erratum 22375, 24313"
> >>>> default y
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> >>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> >>>> index 6e2d254c09eb..62d8cd15fdf2 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> >>>> @@ -54,7 +54,8 @@
> >>>> #define ARM64_HAS_CRC32 33
> >>>> #define ARM64_SSBS 34
> >>>> #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_1188873 35
> >>>> +#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_1165522 36
> >>>>
> >>>> -#define ARM64_NCAPS 36
> >>>> +#define ARM64_NCAPS 37
> >>>>
> >>>> #endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>> index 7d6e974d024a..8f486026ac87 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> >>>> @@ -435,6 +435,9 @@ static inline bool kvm_arch_sve_requires_vhe(void)
> >>>> static inline bool kvm_arch_impl_requires_vhe(void)
> >>>> {
> >>>> /* Some implementations have defects that confine them to VHE */
> >>>> + if (cpus_have_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_1165522))
> >>>> + return true;
> >>>> +
> >>>> return false;
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> >>>> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> >>>> index 23aca66767f9..9681360d0959 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
> >>>> @@ -163,6 +163,12 @@ static __always_inline void __hyp_text
> >>>> __load_guest_stage2(struct kvm *kvm)
> >>>> {
> >>>> write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vtcr, vtcr_el2);
> >>>> write_sysreg(kvm->arch.vttbr, vttbr_el2);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * ARM erratum 1165522 requires the actual execution of the
> >>>> + * above before we can switch to the guest translation regime.
> >>>> + */
> >>>
> >>> Is it about a guest translation 'regime' or should this just say before
> >>> we can enable stage 2 translation?
> >>
> >> No, this isn't strictly about enabling stage-2 translation. This is
> >> about making sure that anything that impacts the guest translations is
> >> actually executed.
> >>
> >> I wonder if it would be clearer to move this outside of
> >> __load_guest_stage2 and make it explicit in the callers of this helper...
> >
> > I think it makes sense to have this here to explain the alternative.
> >
> > But it's the 'switch to guest translation regime' thing that bothers me
> > a bit. Is that an architectural concept (I thought we only had EL1 and
> > EL2 translation regimes in stage 1, and then stage 2 translations). So
> > When you say 'guest translation regime' I'm just not entirely sure what
> > that means, unless I'm missing something.
>
> [coming back to this as I'm preparing the next round]
>
> What I'm trying to convey by "guest translation regime" is the following
> from the ARM ARM:
>
> C5.4.7 AT S1E1R, Address Translate Stage 1 EL1 Read
> [...]
>
> When EL2 is implemented and enabled in the current Security state:
> — If HCR_EL2.{E2H, TGE} is not {1, 1}, the EL1&0 translation regime,
> accessed from EL1.
> — If HCR_EL2.{E2H, TGE} is {1, 1}, the EL2&0 translation regime,
> accessed from EL2.
>
> So maybe I should just bite the bullet and call out EL1/EL2 translation
> regime instead of guest/host.
>
How about the following, does that work?
/*
* ARM erratum 1165522 requires the actual execution of the
* above before we can switch to the EL1/EL0 translation regime
* used by the guest.
*/
Thanks,
Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
