In order to avoid the pointless complexity of maintaining two ioctl
register access views of the same data, this patch blocks ioctl
access to the FPSIMD V-registers on vcpus that support SVE.

This will make it more straightforward to add SVE register access
support.

Since SVE is an opt-in feature for userspace, this will not affect
existing users.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <[email protected]>

---

Changes since RFC v2:

 * New patch

   The initial code was split from "KVM: arm64/sve: Add SVE support to
   register access ioctl interface".  However, some additional
   refactoring makes this change quite noisy: for ease of review,
   I decided it was best to keep the two parts of the change separate.

 * Move core_reg_offset_is_vreg() before validate_core_reg_id()
   (which now makes use of it).

 * Move rejection of KVM_REG_ARM_CORE view of the FPSIMD V-regs on
   SVE-enabled vcpus into validate_core_reg_id(), so that it can be
   applied everywhere appropriate instead of being open-coded.

   This requires vcpu to be pushed down into a few code paths
   (This is the noise alluded to above).
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 0bf0ed3..e1ea73e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -83,7 +83,13 @@ static int core_reg_size_from_offset(u64 off)
        return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int validate_core_reg_id(u64 id)
+static bool core_reg_offset_is_vreg(u64 off)
+{
+       return off >= KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.vregs) &&
+               off < KVM_REG_ARM_CORE_REG(fp_regs.fpsr);
+}
+
+static int validate_core_reg_id(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 id)
 {
        u64 off = core_reg_offset_from_id(id);
        int size = core_reg_size_from_offset(off);
@@ -91,10 +97,18 @@ static int validate_core_reg_id(u64 id)
        if (size < 0)
                return size;
 
-       if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) == size && IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32)))
-               return 0;
+       if (KVM_REG_SIZE(id) != size || !IS_ALIGNED(off, size / sizeof(__u32)))
+               return -EINVAL;
 
-       return -EINVAL;
+       /*
+        * The KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE regs must be used instead of
+        * KVM_REG_ARM_CORE for accessing the FPSIMD V-registers on
+        * SVE-enabled vcpus:
+        */
+       if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) && core_reg_offset_is_vreg(off))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
@@ -116,7 +130,7 @@ static int get_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct 
kvm_one_reg *reg)
            (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
                return -ENOENT;
 
-       if (validate_core_reg_id(reg->id))
+       if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, reg->id))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        if (copy_to_user(uaddr, ((u32 *)regs) + off, KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id)))
@@ -141,7 +155,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct 
kvm_one_reg *reg)
            (off + (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) / sizeof(__u32))) >= nr_regs)
                return -ENOENT;
 
-       if (validate_core_reg_id(reg->id))
+       if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, reg->id))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        if (KVM_REG_SIZE(reg->id) > sizeof(tmp))
@@ -194,7 +208,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
struct kvm_regs *regs)
        return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
+static int copy_core_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+                                u64 __user **uind)
 {
        unsigned int i;
        int total = 0;
@@ -228,7 +243,7 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
                        break;
                }
 
-               if (validate_core_reg_id(id))
+               if (validate_core_reg_id(vcpu, id))
                        continue;
 
                if (uind) {
@@ -243,9 +258,9 @@ static int copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user **uind)
        return total;
 }
 
-static unsigned long num_core_regs(void)
+static unsigned long num_core_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-       return copy_core_reg_indices(NULL);
+       return copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -310,7 +325,7 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
        unsigned long res = 0;
 
-       res += num_core_regs();
+       res += num_core_regs(vcpu);
        res += kvm_arm_num_sys_reg_descs(vcpu);
        res += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu);
        res += NUM_TIMER_REGS;
@@ -327,7 +342,7 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 
__user *uindices)
 {
        int ret;
 
-       ret = copy_core_reg_indices(&uindices);
+       ret = copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, &uindices);
        if (ret < 0)
                return ret;
 
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to