On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:36:01AM +0000, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 07/01/2019 14:41, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > The virt/arm core allocates a kvm_cpu_context_t percpu, at present this is
> > a typedef to kvm_cpu_context and is used to store host cpu context. The
> > kvm_cpu_context structure is also used elsewhere to hold vcpu context.
> > In order to use the percpu to hold additional future host information we
> > encapsulate kvm_cpu_context in a new structure and rename the typedef and
> > percpu to match.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++++--
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 4 ++--
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 14 +++++++++-----
> > arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 2 +-
> > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 79906ce..71645ba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -145,7 +145,11 @@ struct kvm_cpu_context {
> > u32 cp15[NR_CP15_REGS];
> > };
> > -typedef struct kvm_cpu_context kvm_cpu_context_t;
> > +struct kvm_host_data {
> > + struct kvm_cpu_context host_ctxt;
> > +};
> > +
> > +typedef struct kvm_host_data kvm_host_data_t;
> > struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > struct kvm_cpu_context ctxt;
> > @@ -163,7 +167,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> > struct kvm_vcpu_fault_info fault;
> > /* Host FP context */
> > - kvm_cpu_context_t *host_cpu_context;
> > + struct kvm_cpu_context *host_cpu_context;
> > /* VGIC state */
> > struct vgic_cpu vgic_cpu;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> > index 102b5a5..6a9bfd4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
> > @@ -102,12 +102,12 @@ extern u32 __init_stage2_translation(void);
> > .endm
> > .macro get_host_ctxt reg, tmp
> > - hyp_adr_this_cpu \reg, kvm_host_cpu_state, \tmp
> > + hyp_adr_this_cpu \reg, kvm_host_data, \tmp
> > .endm
>
> minor nit: We now load "kvm_host_data" instead of the host_ctxt here,
> even though they both are same. Do we need to make this explicitly load
> the address of the host_ctxt member to make sure this doesn't break
> with future changes to the structure ?
> i.e,
> add \reg, \reg, #HOST_DATA_CONTEXT
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]>
Thanks for spotting this.
Are you happy for me to add the Reviewed-by tag if I squash in the following?
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index 6a9bfd4..f182d13 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -103,11 +103,12 @@ extern u32 __init_stage2_translation(void);
.macro get_host_ctxt reg, tmp
hyp_adr_this_cpu \reg, kvm_host_data, \tmp
+ add \reg, \reg, #HOST_DATA_CONTEXT
.endm
.macro get_vcpu_ptr vcpu, ctxt
get_host_ctxt \ctxt, \vcpu
- ldr \vcpu, [\ctxt, #HOST_DATA_VCPU]
+ ldr \vcpu, [\ctxt, #HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU]
kern_hyp_va \vcpu
.endm
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index cb968ff..0deddfb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(CPU_FP_REGS, offsetof(struct kvm_regs, fp_regs));
DEFINE(VCPU_FPEXC32_EL2, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu,
arch.ctxt.sys_regs[FPEXC32_EL2]));
DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_CONTEXT, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu,
arch.host_cpu_context));
- DEFINE(HOST_DATA_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_host_data,
host_ctxt.__hyp_running_vcpu));
+ DEFINE(HOST_CONTEXT_VCPU, offsetof(struct kvm_cpu_context,
__hyp_running_vcpu));
+ DEFINE(HOST_DATA_CONTEXT, offsetof(struct kvm_host_data, host_ctxt));
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
DEFINE(CPU_SUSPEND_SZ, sizeof(struct cpu_suspend_ctx));
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
