From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>

[ Upstream commit 0d640732dbebed0f10f18526de21652931f0b2f2 ]

When we emulate an MMIO instruction, we advance the CPU state within
decode_hsr(), before emulating the instruction effects.

Having this logic in decode_hsr() is opaque, and advancing the state
before emulation is problematic. It gets in the way of applying
consistent single-step logic, and it prevents us from being able to fail
an MMIO instruction with a synchronous exception.

Clean this up by only advancing the CPU state *after* the effects of the
instruction are emulated.

Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.d...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
index dac7ceb1a677..08443a15e6be 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmio.c
@@ -117,6 +117,12 @@ int kvm_handle_mmio_return(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct 
kvm_run *run)
                vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt, data);
        }
 
+       /*
+        * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
+        * in the guest.
+        */
+       kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
+
        return 0;
 }
 
@@ -144,11 +150,6 @@ static int decode_hsr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool 
*is_write, int *len)
        vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.sign_extend = sign_extend;
        vcpu->arch.mmio_decode.rt = rt;
 
-       /*
-        * The MMIO instruction is emulated and should not be re-executed
-        * in the guest.
-        */
-       kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.19.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to