On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:00:27 +0100
Christoffer Dall <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi,

> From: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> 
> Instead of having an open-coded macro, reuse the sys_reg() macro
> that does the exact same thing.

It's not the exact same thing, is it? It looks like being off by 5 bit
to me. I think the patch is still fine, but maybe mention in the commit
message that this difference is OK since it's only used as a key for
comparing register indices?

Cheers,
Andre.

> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 19 ++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index e3e37228ae4e..1a5bea4285e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -965,6 +965,10 @@ static bool access_pmuserenr(struct kvm_vcpu
> *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, return true;
>  }
>  
> +#define
> reg_to_encoding(x)                                            \
> +     sys_reg((u32)(x)->Op0,
> (u32)(x)->Op1,                                \
> +             (u32)(x)->CRn, (u32)(x)->CRm, (u32)(x)->Op2);
> +
>  /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in
> one go */ #define
> DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n)                                    \
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGBVRn_EL1(n)),
> \ @@ -1820,30 +1824,19 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc
> *get_target_table(unsigned target, } }
>  
> -#define
> reg_to_match_value(x)                                         \
> -
> ({                                                            \
> -             unsigned long
> val;                                  \
> -             val  = (x)->Op0 <<
> 14;                                   \
> -             val |= (x)->Op1 <<
> 11;                                   \
> -             val |= (x)->CRn <<
> 7;                                    \
> -             val |= (x)->CRm <<
> 3;                                    \
> -             val |=
> (x)->Op2;                                     \
> -
> val;                                                  \
> -      })
> -
>  static int match_sys_reg(const void *key, const void *elt)
>  {
>       const unsigned long pval = (unsigned long)key;
>       const struct sys_reg_desc *r = elt;
>  
> -     return pval - reg_to_match_value(r);
> +     return pval - reg_to_encoding(r);
>  }
>  
>  static const struct sys_reg_desc *find_reg(const struct
> sys_reg_params *params, const struct sys_reg_desc table[],
>                                        unsigned int num)
>  {
> -     unsigned long pval = reg_to_match_value(params);
> +     unsigned long pval = reg_to_encoding(params);
>  
>       return bsearch((void *)pval, table, num, sizeof(table[0]),
> match_sys_reg); }

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to