On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:52:25PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
> Some optional features of the Arm architecture add new system
> registers that are not present in the base architecture.
> 
> Where these features are optional for the guest, the visibility of
> these registers may need to depend on some runtime configuration,
> such as a flag passed to KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT.
> 
> For example, ZCR_EL1 and ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 need to be hidden if SVE
> is not enabled for the guest, even though these registers may be
> present in the hardware and visible to the host at EL2.
> 
> Adding special-case checks all over the place for individual
> registers is going to get messy as the number of conditionally-
> visible registers grows.
> 
> In order to help solve this problem, this patch adds a new sysreg
> method restrictions() that can be used to hook in any needed
> runtime visibility checks.  This method can currently return
> REG_NO_USER to inhibit enumeration and ioctl access to the register
> for userspace, and REG_NO_GUEST to inhibit runtime access by the
> guest using MSR/MRS.
> 
> This allows a conditionally modified view of individual system
> registers such as the CPU ID registers, in addition to completely
> hiding register where appropriate.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v4:
> 
>  * Move from a boolean sysreg property that just suppresses register
>    enumeration via KVM_GET_REG_LIST, to a multi-flag property that
>    allows independent runtime control of MRS/MSR and user ioctl access.
> 
>    This allows registers to be either hidden completely, or to have
>    hybrid behaviours (such as the not-enumerated, RAZ, WAZ behaviour of
>    "non-present" CPU ID regs).

Sorry for bikeshedding...

> +     /* Check for regs disabled by runtime config */
> +     if (restrictions(vcpu, r) & REG_NO_GUEST) {

Maybe it's worth wrapping this as something like

        reg_runtime_hidden_from_guest(vcpu, r)

... and avoid exposing the raw flags to all the places we have to check?

[...]

> +#define REG_NO_USER  (1 << 0) /* hidden from userspace ioctl interface */
> +#define REG_NO_GUEST (1 << 1) /* hidden from guest */

Perhaps REG_USER_HIDDEN and REG_GUEST_HIDDEN?

Thanks,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to