On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:56:36PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Dave, > > On 26/02/2019 12:13, Dave Martin wrote: > >On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 04:46:57PM +0000, Julien Thierry wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 18/02/2019 19:52, Dave Martin wrote: > >>>In order to give each vcpu its own view of the SVE registers, this > >>>patch adds context storage via a new sve_state pointer in struct > >>>vcpu_arch. An additional member sve_max_vl is also added for each > >>>vcpu, to determine the maximum vector length visible to the guest > >>>and thus the value to be configured in ZCR_EL2.LEN while the is > >> > >>"While the <guest> is active"? > > > >Hmmm, yes. Thanks for deciphering that. Done. > I think it would be more consistent if you use "vcpu" over "guest". After > all ZCR_EL2.LEN is per vCPU.
Yes, that makes sense. Done. Cheers ---Dave _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
