Currently, IRQFD on arm still uses the deferred workqueue mechanism
to inject interrupts into guest, which will likely lead to a busy
context-switching from/to the kworker thread. This overhead is for
no purpose (only in my view ...) and will result in an interrupt
performance degradation.

Implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic() for arm/arm64 to support direct
irqfd MSI injection, by which we can get rid of the annoying latency.
As a result, irqfd MSI intensive scenarios (e.g., DPDK with high packet
processing workloads) will benefit from it.

Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <[email protected]>
---

It seems that only MSI will follow the IRQFD path, did I miss something?

This patch is still under test and sent out for early feedback. If I have
any mis-understanding, please fix me up and let me know. Thanks!

---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/trace.h      | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/trace.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/trace.h
index 55fed77..bc1f4db 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/trace.h
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/trace.h
@@ -27,6 +27,28 @@
                  __entry->vcpu_id, __entry->irq, __entry->level)
 );
 
+TRACE_EVENT(kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic,
+       TP_PROTO(u32 gsi, u32 type, int level, int irq_source_id),
+       TP_ARGS(gsi, type, level, irq_source_id),
+
+       TP_STRUCT__entry(
+               __field(        u32,    gsi             )
+               __field(        u32,    type            )
+               __field(        int,    level           )
+               __field(        int,    irq_source_id   )
+       ),
+
+       TP_fast_assign(
+               __entry->gsi            = gsi;
+               __entry->type           = type;
+               __entry->level          = level;
+               __entry->irq_source_id  = irq_source_id;
+       ),
+
+       TP_printk("gsi %u type %u level %d source %d", __entry->gsi,
+                 __entry->type, __entry->level, __entry->irq_source_id)
+);
+
 #endif /* _TRACE_VGIC_H */
 
 #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
index 99e026d..4cfc3f4 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
 #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
 #include "vgic.h"
+#include "trace.h"
 
 /**
  * vgic_irqfd_set_irq: inject the IRQ corresponding to the
@@ -105,6 +106,26 @@ int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
        return vgic_its_inject_msi(kvm, &msi);
 }
 
+/**
+ * kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic: fast-path for irqfd injection
+ *
+ * Currently only direct MSI injecton is supported.
+ */
+int kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
+                             struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, int level,
+                             bool line_status)
+{
+       int ret;
+
+       trace_kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic(e->gsi, e->type, level, irq_source_id);
+
+       if (unlikely(e->type != KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI))
+               return -EWOULDBLOCK;
+
+       ret = kvm_set_msi(e, kvm, irq_source_id, level, line_status);
+       return ret;
+}
+
 int kvm_vgic_setup_default_irq_routing(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
        struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *entries;
-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to