On 2019-08-16 17:32:38 [+0100], Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Julien,
> hrtimer_callback_running() will be returning true as the callback is
> running somewhere else. This means hrtimer_try_to_cancel()
> would return -1. Therefore hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock() would
> be called.
>
> Did I miss anything?
nope, you are right. I assumed that we had code to deal with this but
didn't find it…
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index 7d7db88021311..40d83c709503e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ void hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock(const struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = timer->base;
- if (base && base->cpu_base) {
+ if (base && base->cpu_base && base->index < MASK_SHIFT) {
spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
}
This should deal with it.
> Cheers,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
