On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:38:56PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:53:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 22/10/19 17:52, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > > > > > Anyways, I'm not at all opposed to adding comments, just want to make sure > > > I'm not forgetting something. If it's ok with you, I'll comment the code > > > and/or functions and reply here to refine them without having to respin > > > the whole series. > > > > Yes, I agree this is better. > > Here's what I ended up with. I also added kvm_memslot_insert_back() to > help document the purpose of incrementing used_slots, and renamed > kvm_shift_memslots_forward()->kvm_memslot_move_backward() and > kvm_shift_memslots_backward()->kvm_memslot_move_forward() because I was > having trouble reconciling having the comments focus on the changed > memslot while the names of the functions reflected what happens to the > other memslots.
Oh, and I need to respin the series to fix build bugs on MIPS and PPC, I'll wait to do that until I get a thumbs up on this code. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
