On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:32:17 +0000,
Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Catalin,
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > Catalin, Will: given that this series conflicts with the workaround for
> > erratum 1542419, do you mind taking it via the arm64 tree?
>
> I assume you target 5.5 with this workaround.
Absolutely. I'm happy to look at backports once this is in.
> I don't mind merging it but if you want to queue it, we already have
> a stable for-next/neoverse-n1-stale-instr branch with 1542419 (I'll
> push a fixup on top soon for a clang warning). The other issue is
> that we get a conflict with mainline due to the tx2 erratum. If it
> gets too complicated, I'll also merge for-next/fixes into
> for-next/core.
OK, let me have another look at providing a resolution that includes
all of the above. Worse case, you'll be able to pull the branch
directly.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
