On 28/11/2019 09:26, linmiaohe wrote:
From: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Use wrapper function lock_all_vcpus()/unlock_all_vcpus()
in kvm_vgic_create() to remove duplicated code dealing
with locking and unlocking all vcpus in a vm.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
---
-v2:
Fix some spelling mistake in patch title and commit log.
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
index b3c5de48064c..53e3969dfb52 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ void kvm_vgic_early_init(struct kvm *kvm)
*/
int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
{
- int i, vcpu_lock_idx = -1, ret;
+ int i, ret;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
if (irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
@@ -92,11 +92,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
Extra context:
/*
* Any time a vcpu is run, vcpu_load is called which tries to grab the
* vcpu->mutex. By grabbing the vcpu->mutex of all VCPUs we ensure
* that no other VCPUs are run while we create the vgic.
*/
That comment no longer makes sense here - there's a very similar one already
in lock_all_vcpus(). With that removed:
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <[email protected]>
ret = -EBUSY;
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!mutex_trylock(&vcpu->mutex))
- goto out_unlock;
- vcpu_lock_idx = i;
- }
+ if (!lock_all_vcpus(kvm))
+ return ret;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
if (vcpu->arch.has_run_once)
@@ -125,10 +122,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_create(struct kvm *kvm, u32 type)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.vgic.rd_regions);
out_unlock:
- for (; vcpu_lock_idx >= 0; vcpu_lock_idx--) {
- vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_lock_idx);
- mutex_unlock(&vcpu->mutex);
- }
+ unlock_all_vcpus(kvm);
return ret;
}
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
