On 2020-01-14 02:20, linmiaohe wrote:
Friendly ping :)
Friendly reply:
From: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
The var ret and out jump label is not really needed. Clean them up.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 11 +++--------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index
2fff06114a8f..3b836c91609e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -834,14 +834,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_translate(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
{
- int ret = 0;
-
trace_kvm_set_guest_debug(vcpu, dbg->control);
- if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE) {
vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
@@ -856,8 +852,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct
kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
}
-out:
- return ret;
+ return 0;
I don't think there is anything wrong with the existing code.
It may not be to your own taste, but is in keeping with a lot
of the KVM code.
If you were making changes to this code, I wouldn't object.
But on its own, this is just churn.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
