Due to the way ARMv8.4-NV suppresses traps when accessing EL2
system registers, we can't track when the guest changes its
HCR_EL2.TGE setting. This means we alwats trap EL1 TLBIs,
even if they don't affect any guest.
This obviously has a huge impact on performance, as we handle
TLBI traps as a normal exit, and a normal VHE host issues
thousands of TLBIs when booting (and quite a few when running
userspace).
A cheap way to reduce the overhead is to handle the limited
case of {E2H,TGE}=={1,1} as a guest fixup, as we already have
the right mmu configuration in place. Just execute the decoded
instruction right away and return to the guest.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c | 6 ++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 28 +++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index d8aae4b5f089..c892fdfecf56 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -539,6 +539,38 @@ static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_eret(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu)
return true;
}
+static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ u32 instr;
+ u64 val;
+
+ /*
+ * Ideally, we would never trap on EL1 TLB invalidations when the
+ * guest's HCR_EL2.{E2H,TGE} == {1,1}. But "thanks" to ARMv8.4, we
+ * don't trap writes to HCR_EL2, meaning that we can't track
+ * changes to the virtual TGE bit. So we leave HCR_EL2.TTLB set on
+ * the host. Oopsie...
+ *
+ * In order to speed-up EL1 TLBIs from the vEL2 guest when TGE is
+ * set, try and handle these invalidation as quickly as possible,
+ * without fully exiting (unless this needs forwarding).
+ */
+ if (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) != ESR_ELx_EC_SYS64 ||
+ !vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu) ||
+ (__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H |
HCR_TGE))
+ return false;
+
+ instr = esr_sys64_to_sysreg(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu));
+ if (sys_reg_Op0(instr) != TLBI_Op0 ||
+ sys_reg_Op1(instr) != TLBI_Op1_EL1)
+ return false;
+
+ val = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(vcpu));
+ __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(NULL, val, instr);
+ __kvm_skip_instr(vcpu);
+
+ return true;
+}
static bool __hyp_text handle_tx2_tvm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
@@ -669,6 +701,9 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu
*vcpu, u64 *exit_code,
if (__hyp_handle_eret(vcpu))
return true;
+ if (__hyp_handle_tlbi_el1(vcpu))
+ return true;
+
if (!__populate_fault_info(vcpu))
return true;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
index 71e4e86e0981..ef52c5a58866 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c
@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
u64 val, u64 sys_enc
dsb(ishst);
/* Switch to requested VMID */
- __tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
+ if (mmu)
+ __tlb_switch_to_guest(mmu, &cxt);
/*
* Execute the same instruction as the guest hypervisor did,
@@ -317,5 +318,6 @@ void __hyp_text __kvm_tlb_el1_instr(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu,
u64 val, u64 sys_enc
dsb(ish);
isb();
- __tlb_switch_to_host(mmu, &cxt);
+ if (mmu)
+ __tlb_switch_to_host(mmu, &cxt);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index f20f5975633f..c464bc3d8dad 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -2688,6 +2688,8 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct
sys_reg_params *p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
u32 sys_encoding = sys_insn(p->Op0, p->Op1, p->CRn, p->CRm, p->Op2);
+ u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
+ struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
/*
* If we're here, this is because we've trapped on a EL1 TLBI
@@ -2706,27 +2708,15 @@ static bool handle_tlbi_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct sys_reg_params *p,
mutex_lock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
- if ((__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2) & (HCR_E2H | HCR_TGE)) != (HCR_E2H |
HCR_TGE)) {
- u64 virtual_vttbr = vcpu_read_sys_reg(vcpu, VTTBR_EL2);
- struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu;
-
- mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
- if (mmu)
- kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_el1_instr,
- mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
+ mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, HCR_VM);
+ if (mmu)
+ kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_el1_instr,
+ mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
- mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
- if (mmu)
- kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_el1_instr,
- mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
- } else {
- /*
- * ARMv8.4-NV allows the guest to change TGE behind
- * our back, so we always trap EL1 TLBIs from vEL2...
- */
+ mmu = lookup_s2_mmu(vcpu->kvm, virtual_vttbr, 0);
+ if (mmu)
kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_el1_instr,
- &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
- }
+ mmu, p->regval, sys_encoding);
mutex_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->lock);
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
