On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 11:50:58AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 04/14/2020 10:31 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > We don't need to be quite as strict about mismatched AArch32 support, > > which is good because the friendly hardware folks have been busy > > mismatching this to their hearts' content. > > > > * We don't care about EL2 or EL3 (there are silly comments concerning > > the latter, so remove those) > > > > * EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1 capability and handled > > gracefully when a mismatch occurs > > > > * EL1 support is gated by the ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL0 capability and handled > > s/EL1/EL0 > > > gracefully when a mismatch occurs > > > > Relax the AArch32 checks to FTR_NONSTRICT. > > Agreed. We should do something similar for the features exposed by the > ELF_HWCAP, of course in a separate series.
Hmm, I didn't think we needed to touch the HWCAPs, as they're derived from the sanitised feature register values. What am I missing? Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
