From: Zenghui Yu <[email protected]> If we're going to fail out the vgic_add_lpi(), let's make sure the allocated vgic_irq memory is also freed. Though it seems that both cases are unlikely to fail.
Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] --- virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c index d53d34a33e35d..c012a52b19f57 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c @@ -96,14 +96,21 @@ static struct vgic_irq *vgic_add_lpi(struct kvm *kvm, u32 intid, * We "cache" the configuration table entries in our struct vgic_irq's. * However we only have those structs for mapped IRQs, so we read in * the respective config data from memory here upon mapping the LPI. + * + * Should any of these fail, behave as if we couldn't create the LPI + * by dropping the refcount and returning the error. */ ret = update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL, false); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq); return ERR_PTR(ret); + } ret = vgic_v3_lpi_sync_pending_status(kvm, irq); - if (ret) + if (ret) { + vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq); return ERR_PTR(ret); + } return irq; } -- 2.26.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
