Hi Catalin,

I have some questions after deep reading your patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8824261/ which enables hardware updates
of the Access Flag for Stage 2 page tables.

I notice that at the bottom of commit message, you said the following words:
"After some digging through the KVM code, I concluded that hardware DBM
(dirty bit management) support is not feasible for Stage 2. A potential
user would be dirty logging but this requires a different bitmap exposed
to Qemu and, to avoid races, the stage 2 mappings need to be mapped
read-only on clean, writable on fault. This assumption simplifies the
hardware Stage 2 AF support."

I have three questions here.

1. I do not understand the reason well about "not feasible". Does the main 
reason
   for this is the "races" you referred?

2. What does the "races" refer to? Do you mean the races between [hardware S2 
DBM]
   and [dirty information collection that executed by KVM]?

   During VM live migration, Qemu will send dirty page iteratively and finally 
stop
   VM when dirty pages is not too much. We may miss dirty pages during each 
iteration
   before VM stop, but there are no races after VM stop, so we won't miss dirty 
pages
   finally. It seems that "races" is not a convinced reason for "not feasible".

3. You said that disable hardware S2 DBM support can simplify the hardware S2 
AF support.
   Could you please explain the reason in detail?



Expect your reply. Many Thanks!

Thanks,
Keqian.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to