On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 06:09:00PM +0800, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Triggers PPIs by setting up a 10msec timer and test the latency.
> For this test can be time consuming, we add time limit for loop_test
> to make sure each test should be done in a certain time(5 sec here).

Having a time limit for the micro-bench tests might be a good idea, as
the overall unit test timeout configured by unittests.cfg can't measure
each individual micro-bench test separately, but it seems what we're
really doing here is saying that we can't do 65536 10ms long vtimer-ppi
tests, so let's do 500 instead -- however by using time to dictate the
count.

I think I'd rather see NTIMES be changed to a micro-bench test parameter
that defaults to 65536, but for the vtimer-ppi test it can be set to
something much smaller.

Also, please create a separate patch for the loop_test()/ntimes changes.
If you'd still like to do a per micro-bench test timeout as well, then
please create a separate patch for that too.

Thanks,
drew

> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <wangjingy...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arm/micro-bench.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c
> index 91af1f7..dbe8e54 100644
> --- a/arm/micro-bench.c
> +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,11 @@
>  #include <asm/gic-v3-its.h>
>  
>  #define NTIMES (1U << 16)
> +#define MAX_NS (5 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000UL)
> +
> +#define IRQ_VTIMER           27
> +#define ARCH_TIMER_CTL_ENABLE        (1 << 0)
> +#define ARCH_TIMER_CTL_IMASK (1 << 1)
>  
>  static u32 cntfrq;
>  
> @@ -33,9 +38,16 @@ static bool ipi_hw;
>  
>  static void gic_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +     u32 irqstat = gic_read_iar();
>       irq_ready = false;
>       irq_received = true;
> -     gic_write_eoir(gic_read_iar());
> +     gic_write_eoir(irqstat);
> +
> +     if (irqstat == IRQ_VTIMER) {
> +             write_sysreg((ARCH_TIMER_CTL_IMASK | ARCH_TIMER_CTL_ENABLE),
> +                             cntv_ctl_el0);
> +             isb();
> +     }
>       irq_ready = true;
>  }
>  
> @@ -195,6 +207,47 @@ static void lpi_exec(void)
>       assert_msg(irq_received, "failed to receive LPI in time, but received 
> %d successfully\n", received);
>  }
>  
> +static bool timer_prep(void)
> +{
> +     static void *gic_isenabler;
> +
> +     gic_enable_defaults();
> +     install_irq_handler(EL1H_IRQ, gic_irq_handler);
> +     local_irq_enable();
> +
> +     gic_isenabler = gicv3_sgi_base() + GICR_ISENABLER0;
> +     writel(1 << IRQ_VTIMER, gic_isenabler);
> +     write_sysreg(ARCH_TIMER_CTL_ENABLE, cntv_ctl_el0);
> +     isb();
> +
> +     gic_prep_common();
> +     return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void timer_exec(void)
> +{
> +     u64 before_timer;
> +     u64 timer_10ms;
> +     unsigned tries = 1 << 28;
> +     static int received = 0;
> +
> +     irq_received = false;
> +
> +     before_timer = read_sysreg(cntvct_el0);
> +     timer_10ms = cntfrq / 100;
> +     write_sysreg(before_timer + timer_10ms, cntv_cval_el0);
> +     write_sysreg(ARCH_TIMER_CTL_ENABLE, cntv_ctl_el0);
> +     isb();
> +
> +     while (!irq_received && tries--)
> +             cpu_relax();
> +
> +     if (irq_received)
> +             ++received;
> +
> +     assert_msg(irq_received, "failed to receive PPI in time, but received 
> %d successfully\n", received);
> +}
> +
>  static void hvc_exec(void)
>  {
>       asm volatile("mov w0, #0x4b000000; hvc #0" ::: "w0");
> @@ -241,6 +294,7 @@ static struct exit_test tests[] = {
>       {"ipi",                 ipi_prep,       ipi_exec,               true},
>       {"ipi_hw",              ipi_hw_prep,    ipi_exec,               true},
>       {"lpi",                 lpi_prep,       lpi_exec,               true},
> +     {"timer_10ms",          timer_prep,     timer_exec,             true},
>  };
>  
>  struct ns_time {
> @@ -261,27 +315,32 @@ static void ticks_to_ns_time(uint64_t ticks, struct 
> ns_time *ns_time)
>  
>  static void loop_test(struct exit_test *test)
>  {
> -     uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = NTIMES;
> +     uint64_t start, end, total_ticks, ntimes = 0;
>       struct ns_time total_ns, avg_ns;
>  
> +     total_ticks = 0;
>       if (test->prep) {
>               if(!test->prep()) {
> -
>                       printf("%s test skipped\n", test->name);
>                       return;
>               }
>       }
> -     isb();
> -     start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
> -     while (ntimes--)
> +
> +     while (ntimes < NTIMES && total_ns.ns < MAX_NS) {
> +             isb();
> +             start = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
>               test->exec();
> -     isb();
> -     end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
> +             isb();
> +             end = read_sysreg(cntpct_el0);
> +
> +             ntimes++;
> +             total_ticks += (end - start);
> +             ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);
> +     }
>  
> -     total_ticks = end - start;
>       ticks_to_ns_time(total_ticks, &total_ns);
> -     avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / NTIMES;
> -     avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / NTIMES;
> +     avg_ns.ns = total_ns.ns / ntimes;
> +     avg_ns.ns_frac = total_ns.ns_frac / ntimes;
>  
>       printf("%-30s%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 "%15" PRId64 ".%-15" PRId64 
> "\n",
>               test->name, total_ns.ns, total_ns.ns_frac, avg_ns.ns, 
> avg_ns.ns_frac);
> -- 
> 2.19.1
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to