On 2020-05-28 13:36, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-05-26 17:18, James Morse wrote:
KVM sets HCR_EL2.TACR (which it calls HCR_TAC) via HCR_GUEST_FLAGS.

TAC is a leftover from 32bit.

This means ACTLR* accesses from the guest are always trapped, and
always return the value in the sys_regs array.

The guest can't change the value of these registers, so we are
save restoring the reset value, which came from the host.

Stop save/restoring this register.

This also stops this register being affected by sysregs_loaded_on_cpu,
so we can provide 32 bit accessors that always use the in-memory copy.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c | 2 --
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c      | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
index 75b1925763f1..57116cf3a1a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/sysreg-sr.c
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
__sysreg_save_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
 {
        ctxt->sys_regs[CSSELR_EL1]   = read_sysreg(csselr_el1);
        ctxt->sys_regs[SCTLR_EL1]    = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_SCTLR);
-       ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1]    = read_sysreg(actlr_el1);
        ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1]    = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_CPACR);
        ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1]    = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR0);
        ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1]    = read_sysreg_el1(SYS_TTBR1);
@@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ static void __hyp_text
__sysreg_restore_el1_state(struct kvm_cpu_context *ctxt)
                isb();
        }

-       write_sysreg(ctxt->sys_regs[ACTLR_EL1],              actlr_el1);

If we don't need to save/restore it, we can also drop its presence
in the sys_regs array.

        write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[CPACR_EL1],  SYS_CPACR);
        write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR0_EL1],  SYS_TTBR0);
        write_sysreg_el1(ctxt->sys_regs[TTBR1_EL1],  SYS_TTBR1);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 2eda539f3281..aae58513025c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ u64 vcpu_read_sys_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int reg)
        switch (reg) {
        case CSSELR_EL1:        return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CSSELR_EL1);
        case SCTLR_EL1:         return read_sysreg_s(SYS_SCTLR_EL12);
-       case ACTLR_EL1:         return read_sysreg_s(SYS_ACTLR_EL1);
        case CPACR_EL1:         return read_sysreg_s(SYS_CPACR_EL12);
        case TTBR0_EL1:         return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR0_EL12);
        case TTBR1_EL1:         return read_sysreg_s(SYS_TTBR1_EL12);
@@ -124,7 +123,6 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64
val, int reg)
        switch (reg) {
        case CSSELR_EL1:        write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CSSELR_EL1);    return;
        case SCTLR_EL1:         write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_SCTLR_EL12);    return;
-       case ACTLR_EL1:         write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_ACTLR_EL1);     return;
        case CPACR_EL1:         write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_CPACR_EL12);    return;
        case TTBR0_EL1:         write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR0_EL12);    return;
        case TTBR1_EL1:         write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_TTBR1_EL12);    return;

It strikes me that we don't even have a trap handler for this sysreg,
whether it is 32 or 64bit... That's a bit unfortunate, to say the
least...

Ah, no. the sucker is hidden away in "generic_v8"...

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to