On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:28:07PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:37:14AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 05:13:10PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h 
> > > b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > index 554a7e8ecb07..55dfff8ca466 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> > > @@ -943,6 +943,7 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/build_bug.h>
> > >  #include <linux/types.h>
> > > +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> > >  
> > >  #define __DEFINE_MRS_MSR_S_REGNUM                                \
> > >  "        .irp    
> > > num,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30\n"
> > >  \
> > > @@ -1024,6 +1025,17 @@
> > >           write_sysreg(__scs_new, sysreg);                        \
> > >  } while (0)
> > >  
> > > +#define read_sysreg_par() ({                                             
> > > \
> > > + unsigned long flags;                                            \
> > > + u64 par;                                                        \
> > > + local_irq_save(flags);                                          \
> > > + asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "dmb sy", ARM64_WORKAROUND_1508412));    \
> > > + par = read_sysreg(par_el1);                                     \
> > > + asm(ALTERNATIVE("nop", "dmb sy", ARM64_WORKAROUND_1508412));    \
> > > + local_irq_restore(flags);                                       \
> > > + par;                                                            \
> > > +})
> > 
> > As an alternative to local_irq_save/restore, we could have added a dmb
> > in the kernel_exit macro. The minor nit here is that we always disable
> > interrupts even when the erratum doesn't apply.
> > 
> > The EL1 code accessing PAR_EL1 already runs with interrupts disabled
> > (which covers the prior AT instruction). If that's the case for KVM as
> > well, we could drop the local_irq_* entirely and just leave the DMB in
> > the exit to guest code.
> 
> I wonder if that's actually a more robust approach in the case of psuedo
> NMIs using ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING?

Good point, so better do the dmb on the return path for both kernel and
hyp.

-- 
Catalin
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to