Hi Eric, > -----Original Message----- > From: iommu [mailto:iommu-boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of > Auger Eric > Sent: 23 September 2020 12:47 > To: yuzenghui <yuzeng...@huawei.com>; eric.auger....@gmail.com; > io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > k...@vger.kernel.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; j...@8bytes.org; > alex.william...@redhat.com; jacob.jun....@linux.intel.com; > yi.l....@intel.com; robin.mur...@arm.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_SET_PASID_TABLE
... > > Besides, before going through the whole series [1][2], I'd like to > > know if this is the latest version of your Nested-Stage-Setup work in > > case I had missed something. > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200320161911.27494-1-eric.au...@redhat.com > > [2] > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414150607.28488-1-eric.au...@redhat.com > > yes those 2 series are the last ones. Thank you for reviewing. > > FYI, I intend to respin within a week or 2 on top of Jacob's [PATCH v10 0/7] > IOMMU user API enhancement. Thanks for that. Also is there any plan to respin the related Qemu series as well? I know dual stage interface proposals are still under discussion, but it would be nice to have a testable solution based on new interfaces for ARM64 as well. Happy to help with any tests or verifications. Please let me know. Thanks, Shameer _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
