Hi Eric, > -----Original Message----- > From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.au...@redhat.com] > Sent: 14 January 2021 16:58 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com>; > Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-phili...@linaro.org> > Cc: Xieyingtai <xieying...@huawei.com>; alex.william...@redhat.com; > wangxingang <wangxinga...@huawei.com>; k...@vger.kernel.org; > m...@kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; vivek.gau...@arm.com; > io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; qubingbing <qubingb...@hisilicon.com>; > Zengtao (B) <prime.z...@hisilicon.com>; zhangfei....@linaro.org; > eric.auger....@gmail.com; w...@kernel.org; kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; > robin.mur...@arm.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with > unmanaged ASIDs > > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote: > > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe, > > > > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote: > >> Hi Jean, > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-phili...@linaro.org] > >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54 > >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com> > >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.au...@redhat.com>; wangxingang > >>> <wangxinga...@huawei.com>; Xieyingtai <xieying...@huawei.com>; > >>> k...@vger.kernel.org; m...@kernel.org; j...@8bytes.org; > w...@kernel.org; > >>> io...@lists.linux-foundation.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > >>> vivek.gau...@arm.com; alex.william...@redhat.com; > >>> zhangfei....@linaro.org; robin.mur...@arm.com; > >>> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger....@gmail.com; Zengtao (B) > >>> <prime.z...@hisilicon.com>; qubingbing <qubingb...@hisilicon.com> > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation > with > >>> unmanaged ASIDs > >>> > >>> Hi Shameer, > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi > wrote: > >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei, > >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related > >>> patches > >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin > of > >>> Eric's series? > >>>> Please share your thoughts. > >>> > >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches > >>> based on mainline? > >> > >> Yes. > >> > >> The uacce-devel branches from > >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment > >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch > >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.) > As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to > rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git > repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.
I think it is the uacce-devel-5.11 branch, but will wait for Jean or Zhangfei to confirm. Thanks, Shameer > Thanks > > Eric > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Hi Eric, > >> > >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make > sense > >> to rebase on top of either of those? > >> > >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that. > > > > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-) > > > > Thanks > > > > Eric > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Shameer > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Jean > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > iommu mailing list > > io...@lists.linux-foundation.org > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
