On 2021-03-19 16:42, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:25:26PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:

A common pattern is to conditionally update ZCR_ELx in order
to avoid the "self-synchronizing" effect that writing to this
register has.

Let's provide an accessor that does exactly this.

Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>

+#define sve_cond_update_zcr_vq(val, reg)               \
+       do {                                            \
+               u64 __zcr = read_sysreg_s((reg));       \
+               u64 __new = __zcr & ~ZCR_ELx_LEN_MASK;      \
+               __new |= (val) & ZCR_ELx_LEN_MASK;  \
+               if (__zcr != __new)                     \
+                       write_sysreg_s(__new, (reg));   \
+       } while (0)
+

Do compilers actually do much better with this than with a static
inline like the other functions in this header?  Seems like something
they should be figuring out.

It's not about performance or anything of the sort: in most cases
where we end-up using this, it is on the back of an exception.
So performance is the least of our worries.

However, the "reg" parameter to read/write_sysreg_s() cannot
be a variable, because it is directly fed to the assembler.
If you want to use functions, you need to specialise them per
register. At this point, I'm pretty happy with a #define.

        M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to