Hi Ricardo,
It may be nicer to introduce UCALL_UNHANDLED with this patch and have it come fist in the series. Thanks, drew On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 09:03:51PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > x86 reports unhandled vectors using port IO at a specific port number, > which is replicating what ucall already does for x86. Aarch64, on the > other hand, reports unhandled vector exceptions with a ucall using a > recently added UCALL_UNHANDLED ucall type. > > Replace the x86 unhandled vector exception handling to use ucall > UCALL_UNHANDLED instead of port IO. > > Tested: Forcing a page fault in the ./x86_64/xapic_ipi_test > halter_guest_code() shows this: > > $ ./x86_64/xapic_ipi_test > ... > Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0xe) > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <[email protected]> > --- > .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h | 2 -- > .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c | 15 ++++++--------- > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > index 0b30b4e15c38..379f12cbdc06 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h > @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@ > #define CPUID_PKU (1ul << 3) > #define CPUID_LA57 (1ul << 16) > > -#define UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT 0xfff0u > - > /* General Registers in 64-Bit Mode */ > struct gpr64_regs { > u64 rax; > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c > b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c > index a8906e60a108..284d26a25cd3 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c > @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static void set_idt_entry(struct kvm_vm *vm, int > vector, unsigned long addr, > > void kvm_exit_unexpected_vector(uint32_t value) > { > - outl(UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT, value); > + ucall(UCALL_UNHANDLED, 1, value); > } > > void route_exception(struct ex_regs *regs) > @@ -1260,16 +1260,13 @@ void vm_handle_exception(struct kvm_vm *vm, int > vector, > > void assert_on_unhandled_exception(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid) > { > - if (vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO > - && vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.port == UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT > - && vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.size == 4) { > - /* Grab pointer to io data */ > - uint32_t *data = (void *)vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid) > - + vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.data_offset; > + struct ucall uc; > > + if (get_ucall(vm, vcpuid, &uc) == UCALL_UNHANDLED) { > + uint64_t vector = uc.args[0]; > TEST_ASSERT(false, > - "Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0x%x)", > - *data); > + "Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0x%lx)", > + vector); > } > } > > -- > 2.31.1.498.g6c1eba8ee3d-goog > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
