Hi Ricardo,

On 5/3/21 1:09 PM, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:24:04PM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote:
>> x86, the only arch implementing exception handling, reports unhandled
>> vectors using port IO at a specific port number. This replicates what
>> ucall already does.
>>
>> Introduce a new ucall type, UCALL_UNHANDLED, for guests to report
>> unhandled exceptions. Then replace the x86 unhandled vector exception
>> reporting to use it instead of port IO.  This new ucall type will be
>> used in the next commits by arm64 to report unhandled vectors as well.
>>
>> Tested: Forcing a page fault in the ./x86_64/xapic_ipi_test
>>      halter_guest_code() shows this:
>>
>>      $ ./x86_64/xapic_ipi_test
>>      ...
>>        Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0xe)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <[email protected]>

Eric

>> ---
>>  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h    |  1 +
>>  .../selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h      |  2 --
>>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c  | 15 ++++++---------
>>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> index bea4644d645d..7880929ea548 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util.h
>> @@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ enum {
>>      UCALL_SYNC,
>>      UCALL_ABORT,
>>      UCALL_DONE,
>> +    UCALL_UNHANDLED,
>>  };
>>  
>>  #define UCALL_MAX_ARGS 6
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>> index 12889d3e8948..ff4da2f95b13 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/processor.h
>> @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@
>>  #define CPUID_PKU           (1ul << 3)
>>  #define CPUID_LA57          (1ul << 16)
>>  
>> -#define UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT 0xfff0u
>> -
>>  /* General Registers in 64-Bit Mode */
>>  struct gpr64_regs {
>>      u64 rax;
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>> index e156061263a6..96e2bd9d66eb 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/processor.c
>> @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static void set_idt_entry(struct kvm_vm *vm, int 
>> vector, unsigned long addr,
>>  
>>  void kvm_exit_unexpected_vector(uint32_t value)
>>  {
>> -    outl(UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT, value);
>> +    ucall(UCALL_UNHANDLED, 1, value);
>>  }
>>  
>>  void route_exception(struct ex_regs *regs)
>> @@ -1260,16 +1260,13 @@ void vm_install_vector_handler(struct kvm_vm *vm, 
>> int vector,
>>  
>>  void assert_on_unhandled_exception(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
>>  {
>> -    if (vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO
>> -            && vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.port == UNEXPECTED_VECTOR_PORT
>> -            && vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.size == 4) {
>> -            /* Grab pointer to io data */
>> -            uint32_t *data = (void *)vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)
>> -                    + vcpu_state(vm, vcpuid)->io.data_offset;
>> +    struct ucall uc;
>>  
>> +    if (get_ucall(vm, vcpuid, &uc) == UCALL_UNHANDLED) {
>> +            uint64_t vector = uc.args[0];
>>              TEST_ASSERT(false,
>> -                        "Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0x%x)",
>> -                        *data);
>> +                        "Unexpected vectored event in guest (vector:0x%lx)",
>> +                        vector);
> 
> nit: Could have changed this TEST_ASSERT(false, ...) to TEST_FAIL while
> touching it.
> 
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.31.1.527.g47e6f16901-goog
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Reply via email to