On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:56:59 +0100,
Ricardo Koller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 05:19:03PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 17:07:40 +0100,
> > Sean Christopherson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 06, 2021, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > This is becoming a bit messy. I'd rather drop the whole series from
> > > > -next, and get something that doesn't break in the middle. Please
> > > > resend the series tested on top of -rc4.
> > >
> > > That'd be my preference too. I almost asked if it could be (temporarily)
> > > dropped, but I assumed the hashes in -next are intended to be stable.
> >
> > I usually try and keep these commits stable.
> >
> > But in this case, we end-up with a broken build at some point in the
> > series. For such cases, I'm more than happy to drop the series and
> > merge a clean version again (I keep each series on a separate branch
> > for this exact purpose).
>
> Thank you both. I will send a new series with the fix and Seans
> suggestions (tested on the latest rc).
>
> Apologies again for the mess.
No worries, that's a pretty common situation.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
