On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 02:39:42PM +0100, Fuad Tabba wrote: > On deactivating traps, restore the value of mdcr_el2 from the > vcpu context, rather than directly reading the hardware register. > Currently, the two values are the same, i.e., the hardware > register and the vcpu one. A future patch will be changing the > value of mdcr_el2 on activating traps, and this ensures that its > value will be restored. > > No functional change intended. > > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <[email protected]> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c > b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c > index f7af9688c1f7..430b5bae8761 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/switch.c > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static void __deactivate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > ___deactivate_traps(vcpu); > > - mdcr_el2 = read_sysreg(mdcr_el2); > + mdcr_el2 = vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2;
Do you need to change the VHE code too? Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
