On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:58:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> +static void reset_pmu_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc
> *r)
> +{
> + u64 n, mask;
> +
> + /* No PMU available, any PMU reg may UNDEF... */
> + if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> + return;
> +
> + n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
> + n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> +
> + reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
> +
> + mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
> + if (n)
> + mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
> +
> + __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
Would this read more logically to structure it as:
mask = BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
n = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0) >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT;
n &= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
if (n)
mask |= GENMASK(n - 1, 0);
reset_unknown(vcpu, r);
__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= mask;
?
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
