kvm_target_cpu() never returns a negative error code, so check_kvm_target() would never have 'ret' filled with a negative error code. Hence the percpu probe via check_kvm_target_cpu() does not make sense as its never going to find an unsupported CPU, forcing kvm_arch_init() to exit early. Hence lets just drop this percpu probe (and also check_kvm_target_cpu()) altogether.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Cc: James Morse <[email protected]> Cc: Alexandru Elisei <[email protected]> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <[email protected]> Cc: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> Cc: Will Deacon <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <[email protected]> --- arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c index 19560e457c11..16f93678c17e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c @@ -2010,11 +2010,6 @@ static int finalize_hyp_mode(void) return 0; } -static void check_kvm_target_cpu(void *ret) -{ - *(int *)ret = kvm_target_cpu(); -} - struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr) { struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; @@ -2074,7 +2069,6 @@ void kvm_arch_irq_bypass_start(struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons) int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque) { int err; - int ret, cpu; bool in_hyp_mode; if (!is_hyp_mode_available()) { @@ -2089,14 +2083,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init(void *opaque) kvm_info("Guests without required CPU erratum workarounds can deadlock system!\n" \ "Only trusted guests should be used on this system.\n"); - for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { - smp_call_function_single(cpu, check_kvm_target_cpu, &ret, 1); - if (ret < 0) { - kvm_err("Error, CPU %d not supported!\n", cpu); - return -ENODEV; - } - } - err = kvm_set_ipa_limit(); if (err) return err; -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
